Software testing services that catch the bugs before your users do.

Software testing is the process of checking that software does what it is supposed to do, and finding the defects in it, before real users are affected. It covers verifying every feature works as intended (functional testing), that it holds up under load (performance testing), that it is secure (security testing), that it works across the browsers and devices people use (compatibility testing), and that the connections between systems behave correctly (integration and API testing). The goal is not to prove the software is perfect — it is to find the problems while they are still cheap to fix, so a fault is caught in a test report rather than by a paying customer.

Good testing combines automated tests, which run repeatable checks fast on every change, with manual and exploratory testing, where a skilled person uses judgment to find the problems a script would never think to try. Avaib has a dedicated QA department and has tested software across more than 600 projects since 2004, so testing is a real discipline with us, not a developer glancing over their own work.

Manual testing is a skilled person using the software the way a real user would — following hunches, trying odd inputs, and judging whether the experience actually makes sense. It is best for new features, usability, and exploratory testing where the goal is to deliberately break things in ways no one scripted. Automated testing is tests written once and then run by machine on every change: fast, repeatable and tireless, ideal for regression (re-checking everything that already worked), repetitive checks across many browsers or data sets, and performance runs no human could do by hand.

Neither is enough on its own. Automation catches the things that slip through a rushed manual pass and frees people up; manual and exploratory testing catches the things automation was never told to look for. Avaib uses the right mix for your product rather than selling you only what is easiest to bill.

We cover the full range: functional testing (does every feature do what it should), test automation (repeatable checks on every change), performance and load testing (how it behaves under real and peak traffic), security testing (finding vulnerabilities before an attacker does), compatibility testing (across browsers, screen sizes and devices), and API and integration testing (the connections between your systems). We also handle regression testing so fixed bugs stay fixed, and accessibility testing where it matters.

We do not push every type at every client. We look at your product and where a failure would actually hurt, and focus the testing there, so you pay for coverage that matters rather than a blanket you do not need.

Yes, in a disciplined way. Our QA engineers use advanced AI tools to help generate and maintain test cases, widen coverage and spot risky areas faster — but a senior tester directs the work and reviews everything the tools produce. The AI accelerates the routine, repetitive part of building and keeping tests; the judgment about what to test, what "working" means, and whether the software genuinely holds up stays with an experienced human.

The result is broader, faster testing without lowering the bar. You are not getting tests nobody checked — you are getting a senior QA engineer who can cover more ground because the tooling handles the grunt work.

Yes, and it is common. We start by learning how your software is meant to work and where the real risk sits, then build a test plan around that — you do not need the original developers involved. Independent testing by a team that did not write the code is often more effective, because we have no blind spots about how it "should" work and no incentive to overlook our own mistakes.

This is also how we help teams who have shipped for a while with no real QA and want to get a proper handle on quality before it becomes a bigger problem.

Either. We can embed one or more senior testers directly with your development team so quality is built in every release, we can run a self-contained testing engagement for a specific project or launch, or we can give you blocks of QA hours to draw on when you need extra testing around a release. However we work, we fit into your process and tools — your issue tracker, your pipeline, your release rhythm — rather than forcing you into ours.

The right shape depends on whether you have an ongoing product that needs continuous testing or a one-off release that needs proving. We will recommend the model that gives you the most quality for the least cost on a free scoping call.

It depends on the size and complexity of your software, how much needs testing, whether you want ongoing coverage or a one-off engagement, and how much automation you want built. Testing is usually priced as a dedicated tester or team on a predictable monthly basis, a fixed price for a defined project or release, or blocks of senior QA hours you draw on as needed. Avaib's model is senior QA expertise at a cost-effective rate, typically around USD 25 per hour, which is why businesses in Australia, the US, Canada and the Middle East get thorough testing with us for a fraction of what local firms charge.

After a short conversation about your software and where the risk is, we will send you a free, no-obligation written estimate with a clear scope and a ballpark figure, so you know exactly what is included and what it costs.

No. The test cases, the automation code and the documentation we produce are yours to keep, in your repositories and your tools. If you ever want to bring testing in-house or move it elsewhere, everything you need is already yours.

You stay with us because the testing genuinely improves your software and your team trusts it, not because leaving would strand you without a safety net.